Linking Corporate Institutional Logics and Moral Reasoning – Evidence from Large Danish Audit Firms

نویسندگان

چکیده

This paper examines whether organizational levels of owner/partner, CPA manager, supervisor and other audit staff are associated with institutional logics auditors in large Danish firms. Our findings identify the presence professional logic commercial being two explicit a fiduciary technical-expertise logic. The significant explaining logic, but not Higher moral reasoning female significantly All four identified further tests indicating that partners place more emphasis than supervisors on Additional examine is fiduciary, explain reasoning. We find higher auditor In contrast, lower logics. addition, increased experience

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Iranian Firms

According to agency theory, board of directors plays an important monitoring role in reducing information asymmetry and increasing the transparency of financial statements and social responsibility. This research is concerned with examining board diversity and social responsibility of the firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the years 2011-2015. To do so, a sample of 98 firms was se...

متن کامل

Competition and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Chinese Industrial Firms*

This article investigates whether market competition enhances the incentives of Chinese industrial firms to avoid corporate income tax. We estimate the effects of competition on the relationship between firms reported accounting profits and their imputed profits based on the national income account. To cope with measurement errors and potential endogeneity, we use instrumental variables, exogen...

متن کامل

The Demand for Audit in Private Firms: Recent Large-Sample Evidence from the UK

Although theory suggests that companies would rationally select into audit even if it were not a legal requirement, many countries impose mandatory audits. This is arguably due to an audit having elements of a public good, which may result in not enough audits being purchased without regulatory intervention. The mandatory nature of public company audit has created problems for researchers wishi...

متن کامل

Examining Corporate Tax Evaders: Evidence from the Finalized Audit Cases

This paper aims to (1) analyze the profiles of transgressors (detected evaders); (2) examine reason(s) that triggered a tax audit, causes of tax evasion, audit timeframe and tax penalty charged; and (3) to assess if tax auditors followed the guidelines as stated in the ‘Tax Audit Framework’ when conducting tax audits. In 2011, the Inland Revenue Board Malaysia (IRBM) had audited and finalized 5...

متن کامل

Does Competition Encourage Corporate Profit Misreporting? Evidence from Chinese Firms∗

This paper investigates whether market competition enhances firms’ incentives to hide profits. We develop a theoretical model of firms’ profit hiding behavior in competitive environments and derive several testable hypotheses. We then test the model using a database that covers more than 20,000 large-and-medium-sized industrial firms in China during the period 1995-2002. Our findings show that ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Management-Revue

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['0935-9915', '1861-9908']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2021-1-53